Skip to main content

Smarter B2B Integration: A Must-Have for Food & Beverages Supply Chain Networks

Submitted by admin_partnerlinQ on

Smarter B2B Integration: A Must-Have for Food & Beverages Supply Chain Networks

Consumer spending on food had been remarkably consistent in the US from 2016 to early 2020. As per McKinsey’s study, growth hovered around 4% annually, while total spend was almost evenly split between retail outlets like grocery stores and supermarkets and food service organizations like restaurants, fast-food locations, coffee venues, and school and office canteens. While the COVID-19 pandemic drastically impacted margins for almost all business segments, the food & beverages (F&B) segment rode the storm better than most. From $6196.15 billion in 2021, the industry is expected to reach $8163.61 billion in 2025 at a CAGR of 7%.

Yet, March 2020 upended the distribution of consumer spend dramatically. Amid lockdowns and the perceived health risk in public places, people preferred staying and eating at home. Sales in groceries and supplies grew 29% compared to the previous year, while food service centres saw a corresponding dip of 27%. More cooking at home led to more staples sales, while consumers increasingly turned to comfort food to cope with heightening anxiety. Canned soup sales were up 200% year on year, frozen food 40%, potato chips 30%, and popcorn 48%.

Rebalancing Supplies to Address Changing Demand

Over the years, F&B distributors have been running a balanced and optimized supply chain where upstream orders come in based on the forecast of downstream orders going out. As a result, revenue margins were also largely dependent on a steady flow in both directions.

But with the rapid shift in consumer spend pattern brought about by the pandemic, the previously balanced system was completely upended. Downstream orders came to an abrupt halt with restaurants closed, but upstream orders kept coming in from the farms, food-service producers, and processors. This led to a clog in the logistical chain as well as shortages in storage space. As distributors cancelled incoming shipments from farmers, food products were stranded upstream, leading to food-security risks for the more vulnerable consumer segments.  

Food distributors have also been by quick-service and casual-dining outlets switching to takeout-only modes of service. Some have partially adapted by taking the online route and initiating delivery services. But those that do not supply to retail channels have had to completely overhaul their sales routes, making their supply chain transformation even more challenging.

Gearing Up for the ‘New Normal’

F&B distributors who managed to rebalance their supplies are now left with overcapacity in their storage facilities and distribution networks. But the pandemic has also taught them a very crucial lesson – about maintaining reliability in supply even at the cost of price. As consumers grow more comfortable with the ‘new normal’, they will continue to save trips to the store given the increased domestic responsibilities they have picked up. While panic buying has ceased, using digital will only continue to increase. Many buyers who preferred to shop offline before the pandemic are now using digital channels having realized the convenience that online ordering provides.

So F&B organizations are increasing production to maintain their presence on retail shelves, while others are scaling up their e-commerce presence. But dilemmas still remain about the means to address demand peaks and the future demand scenarios to prepare for. In addition, consumers need to be reassured, employees protected, and high quality supply maintained even at elevated costs.

For F&B participants from farm to shelf, it is imperative to come up with creative solutions and integrate their collaboration channels to ensure a reliable supply despite intermittent plant closures and demand disruptions.

Supply Chain Integration for Collaboration and Insights

A flexible and agile supply chain can help F&B companies effectively respond to these ongoing challenges. But they also need increased visibility and data from every node of their value chain to generate actionable insights. Lack of transparency exposes supply chains to unnecessary risk; this is exacerbated by using outdated systems or traditional paper tracking and manual inspections. Fragmented information and lack of communication leave parties in the supply network with little to no knowledge of each other’s actions. This leads to inefficiency and waste and generates mistrust among suppliers and their customers. And the problem gets much worse as organizations begin to expand their markets and partner networks.

Increased visibility will also go a long way in keeping operational costs in check. While simple supply chains can optimize costs using spreadsheets, more complex ones are better served by an integrated network solution that does not require customizations for each individual supplier. Modern B2B integration solutions make a business more efficient, more attractive to customers, and less vulnerable to competitive forces. They enable seamless connection to all your network partners, while deploying multiple supply chain solutions within a single implementation process.

Harnessing the Cloud: The Smarter Approach to B2B Integration

The complexities of the post-pandemic landscape are acting as a trigger as more and more industries feel the push to go digital. Only a cloud-based, integrated solution can provide the convenience, scalability, and reliability that food service organizations need for managing data exchange, workflow, and transactions.

Visionet’s PartnerLinQ ensures a simple and robust cloud deployment that minimizes infrastructure costs and enhances analytical reporting powered by Azure’s serverless, scalable event-processing engine. PartnerLinQ is designed to guarantee business success by quickly setting up connections with new partners, customers, and sales channels and seamlessly integrating with smart devices and appliances. It minimizes repetitive processes and works across all data formats and transaction protocols. With PartnerLinQ, F&B enterprises can automate end-to-end workflows, achieve elasticity and scale, and enjoy a hybrid architecture that also integrates with on-premise legacy systems.

As regulatory mandates demand faster and more extensive reporting, customers want more visibility into all aspects of a transaction, and new business models start being formulated, the need for simplified and end-to-end B2B integration becomes more urgent. F&B organizations can no longer afford to work in silos – a smarter B2B integration on cloud can quickly reduce their time-to-market, optimize costs with standard, industry-specific integration processes, and take an omnichannel approach to order fulfilment.
testimonial4

Industry
Knowledge Hub Categories
Category

Are Value-Added Networks the Way to go for B2B Communication?

Submitted by admin_partnerlinQ on

You are probably familiar with this ‘BIG VAN’ claim repeated early and often by the champions of value-added networks (VANs):

‘The advantage of the network is the network itself.’

The claim, like all wide-ranging quotes, is to some extent only relatively true. Its validity depends upon who you are connecting with and how actively you link up with your trading partners. A closer look at the flow of goods and information within your business network will possibly reveal that no single network or VAN can address all your B2B/B2C communication needs.

While EDI and, in some instances, the VAN does help you connect, connecting with all your trading partners translates into a significantly higher ROI.  EDI today means more than simply X12; it means supporting multiple standards, formats, and transactions from X12, UN/EDIFACT, and GS1 XML trade messages to a number of non-EDI formats like JSON, flat files, text files, and proprietary XML message formats.

Read more: The truth behind the “competitive advantage” of value-added networks

EDI also means accessing a diverse set of communication methodologies – like AS2, MFTP, FTP, SFTP, and APIs – each with their own set of variables. While transaction formats and transportation methodologies make EDI more versatile, the complexity of handling such varied data formats and communication methodologies creates its own set of challenges, particularly when you consider the ‘BIG VAN’ value proposition.

The ‘BIG VAN’ value prop proudly claims that all members in your value chain are available on the same network or VAN as yours; while true to some extent, this is not an entirely accurate assessment. A VAN connection is by all accounts handy and, in some cases, necessary to interact with some trading partners. But it certainly is not everything.

The right tool with the right EDI transportation methods delivers far more effectively than ‘BIG VAN’ and at a lesser cost.

The Significance of the EDI VAN Interconnect

The ‘BIG VAN’ claim is largely backed by the EDI VAN interconnect. The interconnect is a tool that helps your value added network communicate with other value added networks and facilitates exchange of EDI transaction documents between connected pairs of trade partners. The more partners you connect with, the bigger the benefit derived from your communication network.

VAN interconnects effectively reduce friction between and among VANs, while also reducing the need for new VANs. The largest of the VANs reduce VAN-related confusion within partner networks by making claims to connect to thousands of trading partners; in effect though, ‘BIG VAN’ highlights the characteristics of EDI under which all EDI solutions and VAN partners operate. 

But what about transactions beyond X12 EDI? 

‘BIG VAN’ and the interconnect rely on a steady stream of ISA and GS identifiers within X12 transactions to move data, without which the ‘BIG VAN’ is about as useful as a cell phone without buttons.  While the VAN connection does handle X12, what about images, APIs, or XML files? These are typically not included in ‘BIG VAN’ offerings and, in most cases, require a different product altogether, adding to your overall cost.

A closer look at the VAN interconnect reveals that the reality of ‘BIG VAN’ is very different from the claim; if the interconnect connects ALL VANs then ALL VANs have the same access to trading partners, which means that ‘BIG VAN’ has a very different concern. ‘BIG VAN’ is concerned that it will inevitably be relegated to the stature of an ‘Ordinary VAN’ and without reservation. 

‘BIG VAN’ makes a big claim and living up to that claim is becoming nearly impossible.  This makes all ‘small VAN’ operators a competitive threat – why else would ‘BIG VAN’ make such claims if not to control and confuse the market? The VAN interconnect and image files remove the confusion from the claim ‘the advantage of the network is the network itself’; what else is there to the reality of ‘BIG VAN’?

The Synergy

Architecturally speaking, an EDI solution is actually made up of three components (or solution layers, if you’ll pardon the expression) – the transportation, transformation, and integration layers. While EDI is very effective when it leverages a ‘VAN’ connection, the VAN component is only a fraction of EDI, less than 30%.

Think about your VAN connection in the same way you think about how your mobile phone functions.  Your mobile phone functions by combining the services provided by the phone manufacturer, an infrastructure provider, and a telecom company; similarly, EDI functions by leveraging the synergy of these component layers to work as a synchronous whole.

Components of the ‘VAN Solution’

  • Transportation. Along with VANs, this layer works using many other methodologies such as AS2, MFTP, FTP, SFTP, and APIs. Most of these methodologies have been around for a couple of decades now. Your VAN, in fact, may still be using FTP to connect you with your VAN mailbox; if it is not leveraging FTP, it is likely using AS2. Get in touch with your EDI team representative and ask, they should be able to tell you.
  • Transformation. The transformation layer facilitates translation between different (EDI) formats. Formats like X12, UN/EDIFACT, GS1 XML trade messages, JSON, flat files, text files, or proprietary XML messages are transformed into formats that your ERP systems can easily understand and use.
  • Integration. In the final layer, the transformed message is available to be consumed by the ERP. API connectors have been introduced in recent years to connect you with your ERP in a normalized way, much like the ODBC connector you may have used in the past.  The integration layer can be an API or a connector like ODBC or ODATA – the main emphasis here lies in providing (a) the route for landing the messages and (b) feedback that lets you know whether the order was rejected or accepted. The latter is the target, which requires the least manual input.

Do More Connections Provide More Benefits?

The key word is ‘choice’. If one network has the potential to provide a competitive advantage, do multiple networks offer even greater benefit?

The quantity of available networks is only one criteria that determines how effective your network is.  Connecting to multiple VANs is, frankly, a drain on resources, particularly when all VANs make use of the same VAN interconnect. 

While there is a need to be mindful of the connections available to your trading partners, using multiple VAN connections to stay in touch makes no sense at all. It is like having two or more cell phones or cable TV subscriptions, particularly when methodologies like AS2, MFTP, FTP, SFTP, and APIs are available.  Many of these options have low or no cost associated with them while VAN costs are subscription based and incur transaction fees that need to be paid monthly, much like that second cell phone that we referenced earlier.

The AS2 Effect

Application Statement 2 (AS2) is used for a reliable and secure transfer of data over the Internet. It provides a direct, unhindered connection with a trading partner and delivers document receipts and real-time tracking without requiring a VAN or a VAN interconnect. Your standard internet connection serves as the transportation layer; it is payload-agnostic, which means you can use the same tool to transmit images and every business has internet connectivity today. 

Unlike a VAN, AS2 does not typically have monthly charges or transaction fees. It reduces the chances of transaction failure by establishing a one-to-one transmission channel, without the need for a middle man, a VAN interconnect, or a ubiquitous VAN. Also, there is a Message Delivery Notification, but more on the MDN at a later time.

Putting It All Together

Now that we have unpacked the ‘BIG VAN’ claim, we can conclude that your EDI solution should provide more than one communication channel, has to be capable of handling a wide range of EDI formats, and MUST integrate smoothly and automatically with your enterprise systems.

We’ve also come to the conclusion that ‘BIG VAN’ cannot support the features that you need without complicating matters with additional software and subscriptions.

That’s why PartnerLinQ is different. PartnerLinQ is not a VAN; rather, it is a highly scalable, dependable, and configurable EDI and B2B communication solution. PartnerLinQ is ‘integration without complication’ that supports integration with Microsoft Dynamics 365 and other ERP systems. It includes an AS2 solution, FTP, MFT, and SFTP and can connect with any VAN, making it the perfect tool for B2B/B2C communication for your EDI and non-EDI partners.

PartnerLinQ also supports API-based ecommerce platforms like Shopify and Magento out of the box, providing your organization a seamless shift between EDI and API integrations; there’s nothing to add and nothing to buy, it’s all in there.

The solution also operates seamlessly between EDI and non-EDI formats – from X12, UN/EDIFACT, and GS1 XML to non-EDI formats like XML and JSON. While there are too many formats to list in a blog, this is a crucial factor that make PartnerLinQ a perfect choice for your EDI, B2B, and API integration and for smooth communication, while decreasing your reliance on ‘BIG VAN.’

Topics
Knowledge Hub Categories

Scalable and centralized end-to-end EDI transaction management

Submitted by admin_partnerlinQ on

Traditional EDI platforms have multiple limitations. Partner onboarding can be time-consuming and frustrating, and communicating with partners that don’t use EDI requires expensive, difficult-to-maintain customization. Complicated error tracking, poor transaction visibility, and vendor rule management lead to expensive chargebacks that can severely impact your margins.

PartnerLinQ simplifies partner onboarding by supporting business rule-based transactions with businesses with existing EDI setups as well as non-EDI businesses. Its advanced business rule engine and extensive pre-configured business rule library make it easy to configure, save, and reuse business rules for multiple partner organizations and EDI scenarios.

PartnerLinQ can be configured to generate alerts that are triggered when specific conditions are met, and can be used to quickly identify EDI bottlenecks or errors. These notifications are a critical component of PartnerLinQ’s error handling functionality and can help reduce business costs by preventing chargebacks and low transaction throughput.

Industry
Topics
Knowledge Hub Categories
Category